Iran is just the new Israel !

An IAEA report presented little fresh evidence on whether or not Iran is trying to build an atomic bomb ???

Consider this: you are a willing outcast, with few longstanding and stable friends and a number of formidable enemies. How do you survive? By trying to convert your enemies to friends, or by instilling fear in your many enemies?

To the extent to which states may choose how they are perceived by others through their strategic posture and actions, when it comes to the matter of nuclear deterrence, critics of Iran's alleged nuclear weapons ambitions (note that I quite deliberately said "alleged") might best calibrate their position in view of Israel's own longstanding nuclearcapability (note the acknowledgement of an existing "capability").

Isn't this just a string of obvious points? Maybe.

But if the criticism of the "bomb Iran" rhetoric is to have any traction, it must be taken further still: as I see it, Iran is just the new Israel.
How so?

Primarily in the way by which Iran's rhetorical posture has combined with its foes' manufactured narrative to serve as a form of deterrent, despite no fresh evidence of it moving to acquire a nuclear arsenal.

The glaring differences

To be sure, there are manifold and critical differences in Israel and Iran's nuclear policies.
Israel has possessed a na nuclear weapons capability since the late 1960s, and remains outside of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) - an international treaty obligation that would place all civilian facilities under the purview of international monitoring and safeguards, and force the abandonment of existing nuclear weapons programmes in return for various security guarantees.

Iran, on the other hand, most certainly does not possess a nuclear weapons capability. It is a signatory to the NPT and is subjected to - despite some resistance - international verification and safeguards standards by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in a way that Israel is not.

That is to say nothing of the strategic alliance Israel enjoys with the United States and many of its allies, or the complex network of historical tensions that Iran faces with regional neighbours such as Iraq and Saudi Arabia.

However, to the degree that the complexity in any Iran-Israel comparison is readily apparent, the similarities between the two states' nuclear rhetoric will no doubt be too long a bow to draw for many, I'm sure.
But bear with me.

The subtle similarities

Whereas the differences I have identified have chiefly concerned actions and, to use the IAEA's own language, "activities", the similarities that justify the headline - "Iran is just the new Israel" - are limited to policy rhetoric.

Israel has famously employed a policy of "nuclear ambiguity" (that is, neither confirming nor denying the existence of such a capability) regarding its military capability since it was first acquired in the late 1960s. Indeed, the policy is embedded within its strategic alliance with the United States and by extension, other prominent allies such as the United Kingdom and Australia.

In recent years, Iran has categorically and emphatically stated that it has no intention of acquiring a nuclear weapons capability and yet a significant amount of Western intelligence, including that by the peak UN nuclear watchdog in November, has contended for some time (to the chagrin of Tehran) that it does.

Iran's posture must be viewed as "opaque" if only because of the external noise surrounding its supposedly civilian atomic energy programme, but also because of the combative nature of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

Indeed, sensationalistic pressure is emanating from the governments of Israel (which in some circles want to "pre-emptively" strike Iran) and the US (which appears to be open to military action, but worded as a more "preventive" measure); the governments of Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, who have acquired significant amounts of conventional armaments in recent years, and who would see the strategic balance shift out of their favour; and many prominent commentators and institutions, such as think-tanks.

The rub is this: no one knows for sure whether Iran is presently working to acquire the atomic bomb or not. Scant fresh evidence was presented in the watchdog IAEA's report, and some of what was presented was of questionable credibility.

We're left with an untenable situation not too dissimilar to that which Iraq faced under Saddam: prove that you don't have what you claim you don't have!

Put another way: Iran is under a greater level of scrutiny for several years of on-again off-again nuclear weapons development than Israel has been for possessing a nuclear arsenal for over 40 years.

To some extent, Saddam chose to play this dangerous game for years and lost (to a very greater extent, he was just simply taken out).

Furthermore, Iran's foes are leaving it little room to move: either develop a nuclear weapons programme to protect the country from future attack, or exploit the disconnect between the state's purely atomic energy intentions and the more sinister motives of the regime espoused by the "bomb Iran" narrative.
In my view, to the extent it can choose, Tehran has opted for the latter.

Why turn the pressure up?

Without doubt, Iran must be able to acquire nuclear energy without undue international pressure. Yet, unlike his predecessor, Ahmadinejad appears to favour the US and Israel-led pressure that comes from his foes touting that he has in fact resumed a nuclear weapons programme. This is because it highlights the Janus-faced nature of these countries' broader dealings with Tehran, as well as a proxy deterrence in lieu of any foreseeable nuclear weapons capability.

Iran's mantra has thus become, as it was at the 2011 IAEA General Conference, "Atomic energy for all, Nuclear weapons for none".

That is, the effect of Iran's nuclear opaqueness serves to instill fear and promote public indignation from its existing enemies - and meanwhile, Iran can be said to be playing by the rules as a party to the NPT.

One only has to review President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's recent statements on the issue of Iran's nuclear weapons capability to give this possibility some credence. For instance, in his official response to the IAEA report, Ahmadinejad made plain that:

"This nation won't retreat one iota from the path it is going."

"Why are you ruining the prestige of the [UN nuclear] agency for absurd US claims?"

"The Iranian nation is wise. It won't build two bombs against 20,000 [nuclear] bombs you have. But it builds something you can't respond to: ethics, decency, monotheism and justice."

Thus, despite the differences between Iran and Israel's nuclear weapons' postures and activities, there are more commonalities than is typically suggested.

Israel's policy of nuclear ambiguity has it denying a capability it is widely known to possess. Iran's policy is to vehemently deny having nuclear weapons ambitions, in the face of ongoing statements by its foes that it does. Importantly, in both circumstances, the actions of external actors is based on the strong belief that Iran and Israel are, or are soon to be, nuclear weapons states.

Of course, in many more critically important ways Iran is nothing like Israel at all! But that's a much easier point to make. And it certainly doesn't help to foster new ways of thinking about a situation that we can safely say is not going to go away anytime soon...

If you shut your eyes the entire world will not spread the darkness !

hey 'Thalaivi' you have to come to the point....The problem for Kerala is the safety of the out dated dam.(I don't know whether you have the knowledge about no any dam is not existing in India which was made at the same period.This is another wonder that this dam is still existing!!!!We have to thank to the construction ability of British or the god who still protecting this dam).Only the new dam will eliminate the concerns of the people residing near the dam.

Why you are opposing even after the promise given by Kerala that the amount of water giving to Tamilnadu will be the same...

I seriously doubt that this TN is a part of Pakistan!!! They are not concerned about anyone else in the world. For them, these corrupted politicians and movie stars are Gods. Believe in what ever they say...
And you people are always talking about 1800 years old Grand Anicut, How can you compare Such a huge dam like Mullaperiyar to Grand Anicut? Do you guys know that the 1800 years old Grand Anicut is less that 5 meter and have no water in it for more that half of the year? But, Mullaperiyar is more that 54m in height and holding almost full of its capacity through out the year. In Grand Anicut, they can repair the whole dam during the summer season. It is not possible in mullaperiyar's case. In fact, there is NO real repairs done yet in this dam... It is also situated in an earth quake prone area... Plus, it is situated around 3000ft, above the sea level. A destruction of this dam will destroy at least 2/3 other dams.


Now, think about the situation if the dam is destroyed. It not only affect Kerala, but it also gonna kill millions of Tamilans. How? If the dam is destroyed, TN will never even gonna get water frm Kerala... That means, all your farms will dry out.. You will have no drinking water.. No electricity since most of the power plants have to shut down...

Mullaperiyar- the real lowdown

1. We had been hearing about Mullaperiyar issue for quite some time and nothing has happened to it, despite quite a few tremors in the dam site. Is this just a wave of sensation created by media? Mullapperiyar dam is weak and vulnerable. This has been confirmed by several expert committees. Each tremor , each flood weakens it further . We are just plain lucky that the dam did not fail till today. Lady luck may not be with us forever. It may fail today, it may fail tomorrow. The risk is real. It is not a hoax. 2. What’s wrong with the dam? Why can’t we fix it? The dam is very old. Not many dams of its age are in service today. The binding material used for the dam is lime. It has leached with age. 3. But Tamil Nadu did some reinforcement in the recent decades. The reinforcement work did more harm than good to the dam. This has also been confirmed by the experts . There is a horizontal full length crack on the dam, in addition to hollow insides caused by the concreting work, leached lime, breakages and leaks. 4. Isn’t this dam thing a game of mud sling between ruling party and opposition of the State? No. All political parties of the state stand united, since it is a question of life of millions. They stood so during the previous Government, they continue to do so during the current Government. This is not a political game, this is real. 5. If it is so, why nothing is happening? It is a complicated legal and political battle between states. Things are before the apex court and it is not so easy to resolve. One state’s demand cannot work out so easily. 6. Mullaperiyar is not that big a dam. It is just 1200 feet long and 150 feet tall. Even if it fails, it may not cause deaths by millions . Especially, considering its immediate flood area is mostly forests. The disaster will not be just from the failure of one dam. If Mullapperiyar dam breaches, it will discharge millions of cubic feet of waters downstream and Idukki Arch Dam, will not be able to stand even a small portion of it. This will cause failure of Idukki Dam, which will cause of the worst tragedies Kerala has ever known. It is almost certain that Idukki Dam will fail if Mullapperiyar breaches. 7. What would happen if Idukki Dam fails? The devastating effect of Idukki Dam failure is just unimaginable. Experts say three districts of Kerala will be totally destroyed. Evacuation of people from these three heavily populated districts sensing a dam breach is just impossible. 8. But what would be the impact? If a dam breaches it will be just a flood, right? Wrong. Idukki dam can discharge 75000 million cubic feet of water. It weighs 22 Billion tons. Dam breaches do not cause just floods. It can even make a landmass disappear instantly. People may die in millions, forests and habitable landscape may get eroded. 9. But Tamil Naduness to the people , place pressure on Center to take urgent actions and save lives by millions. 11. Which political party should I stand with? Which organization is going to do it right? All parties stand united for our lives. Support Kerala state, its current ministers, there is no party politics in this. This is a question of survival, there just cannot be two opinion on this. Be part of any party, any campaign, any movement, any activity for it.

lets help them, not send them FIRE, when they asked for AIR to breath !

It's so funny ICC is pursuing arrest warrant of Col. Gaddafi but not of Americans who killed hundred of thousands civilians all over the world. Iraq, Afghanistan, Drone Attacks on Pakistan which killed so many civilians, support to Israel where civilians are being killed for so many years. 

It will be much more fair if they start from USA. Then people will trust their credibility.

ICC rules and regulations as well international law regarding crime against humanity are developing matters. They use precedents and UN discussion and decisions.

If ICC would have some credits and be able to request crimes against humanity arrest warrants for Chaney, Bush, Blair, Saakashvili in chronological order, and if ICC were dealing with those criminals in time – there would be no needs for Gaddafi warrant, there actually would be no NFZ, no Libyan people killing, no barbaric Live Target Libyan Air Show at all.

Justice is equal accountability; otherwise it is just banal colonization tool.
Leaving Chaney, Bush, Blair, Saakashvili with no prosecution actualy open the World to the Pandora of War.

ICC and UN should take this issue seriously, and perhaps reform or dissolve ICC altogether. As for now - striking feature of ICC is a thorough avoidance of western leaders’ and their puppets crimes, which position this institution as just another intimidation mechanism for sovereign country colonization.

My simple question here is…. Have they got and/or issued ICC for President Bashir of Sudan, the North Korean President Kim Il Song, the Chinese leadership, Burma's Generals, Yemen President, President Mugabe, King of Bahrain etc etc?

Where are the arrest warrants for Bashar al-Assad in Syria and King Hamad bin Isa al-Khalifa in Bahrain. There should be at least another dozen warrants waiting for the Saudi leaders.

ICC like all the other international institutions (UN Security Council, WTO, IMF, OEDC etc) are ALL under the control of the US and its NATO allies and work to the US/Western agenda.

The killing of Osama bin Laden and, only a few days before, the killing of one of Colonel Gaddafi's sons and three of his grandchildren by Nato (in an attack which apparently was targeting Gaddafi himself) raises fundamental questions. Is it ever right to execute our enemies, or should they always be tried for the crimes of which they stand accused? What if there is a possibility of striking a deal that would put an end to their crimes, but would leave past wrongs unpunished and allow the perpetrator to enjoy a comfortable retirement?

That would be all well and good if it were true, however since there was no slaughter or killing of Lybian civilians by Gaddafi or anyone else before we started bombing them then just what is the so called NFZ meant to be doing.

From my understanding there has not been a single Lybian fighter plane in the air from day one but yet we continue to attack infrastructure, hospitals and government buildings. All the things the Lybian people need to protect them from the terrorists that are attcking them with the full suppport of NATO.

What is happening in Lybia is a travesty and brings shame on the west for attacking another defenceless country, murdering women and children and handing over another country to criminals and gangsters.

This is so far beyond the surreal as to be nightmarish: those responsible for the crimes of Fallujah and Jenin, for the attack on Lebanon in 2006 and the Gaza massacres, are not even considered. They, on the contrary, are baying for Libyan blood.

The sooner this Court, Hyporisy's best hope and emblem, is wound up and closed down, the better it will be for all.

The ICC is a sockpuppet of the big western powers that dominate the Security Council. The only reason why Ocampo is engaged in in this witch hunt against yet another African country is because this is what the NATO powers want him to do. Ocampo himself has lot all credibility with his false allegations against Sudan's head of state, who rather than orchestrating killings in his country has actually worked hard to bring about a peaceful resolution in the conflict in Darfur. Claiming to transcend national laws and boundaries established by democratic procedures, the ICC is a troublesome actor that threatens peace and security around the world.

ICC has no legitimacy or credibility. If Ocampo is so concerned about human rights abuses, then he would have investigated the atrocities committed by NATO forces against Libya, including the use of depleted uranium, the killing of civilians, the targeting of Libya's infrastructure, and so on. If the ICC were not a puppet of the western powers, then arrest warrants for the wars of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan would have been issued. Instead, ICC goes after whomever Washington and its partners want. Libya is not even under the jurisdiction of so-called ICC, and anything Ocampo claims to have done against the country is worthless. 

March it passed resolution 1973 which authorised "all necessary measures" to protect Libyan civilians, interpreted by some to authorise the targeting of Gaddafi.

"All necessary measures" can be stretched by you people that would justify the use of nuclear weapons on Tripoli. Such truly grotesque manipulation of the law. 

In early March he concluded that it was: there were "reasonable grounds to believe that crimes against humanity have been and are being committed in Libya"; no genuine national investigation was taking place; and the situation was grave, including "systematic" shootings and war crimes committed "as a matter of policy"

Professor Alan Kuperman said that there is no evidence linking Gaddafi to abuse against civilians:

“Civilians are caught in the middle,” he said. “We didn’t stop a bloodbath but we are prolonging and perpetuating the suffering of civilians in Libya.” He argued that Gaddafi is targeting rebel fighters. There was never a bloodbath of civilians at the hands of Gaddafi....“If Gaddafi were trying to massacre civilians there would be thousands killed, not a couple hundred killed,” Kuperman remarked. Gaddafi said he would show no mercy to rebels, he did not speak about civilians. He even said rebel fighters who laid down their arms and surrendered would receive mercy, explained Kuperman. “He made clear would not target civilians,” he said. “Obama exaggerated the threat."

And other independent investigators have confirmed that there is no evidence that Gaddafi's forces have attacked civilians in western Libya.

Now  My heart goes out to the Lybian people and my contempt for those cheering on the murder of innocents knows no bounds

Survival of the fittest !

At the end of counting of votes in the Kerala Assembly Election The Congress-led UDF and the CPM-led LDF were neck and neck. The UDF at last just managed to edge past the ruling coalition, crossing the half-way mark by a mere two seats in the Assembly.

for the people t the people !

When the results were announced, Congress leaders admitted this was "an embarrassing victory". Ironically, neither side is pleased with the verdict that the Kerala voter has handed out. The LDF for being ousted, the Congress that it was so close a shave. Some leaders admitted that veteran Communist leader and outgoing Chief Minister V S Achuthanandan almost swung it for the LDF,

Yes, no doubt that VS Achuthanandan has played a vital role in this election and that leaded CPI(M) to rewrite the political history of Kerala. The congress leaders could not able to claim any credit for this two members majority in the Assembly. In the very next day of Election dates declaration the state was witnessed a third class Congress drama for dividing the candidatures. The front step leaders were not totally committed to the party's victory.In fact they were in daydreams of post election play. 

Even the most dedicated party member also won't accept it as a moral victory of the party.The statics of result is showing some communal and religious groups are more stronger than the world's largest party in Kerala. If not for a consolidation of communal forces, the result would have been differen. 

The Congress managed to win only 38 of the 82 seats contested, while its ally Muslim League won 20 of 25 seats contested. Yet another Kerala Congress (M) got 9 out of 15 seats. In the same time the communist party proudly topped in the list as the largest party holding the highest number of seats in their account. LDF put up a valiant fight and won 68 seats, the highest any ruling front in the state has got in a successive election. But it was so near and yet so far.

poles !

The Communist Party of India-Marxist (CPI-M) veteran had led the charge for the LDF - and it was during campaigning that he was famously called 'old man' by Congress MP Rahul Gandhi. The former then hit back calling the latter 'Amul baby'.

Another amazing fact was even Kerala Congress chief Ramesh Chennithala won only after going through an uncertain time in the opening hours of the vote count.

While reacting to the results, CPI-M state secretary Pinarayi Vijayan said they accept the verdict and would work in the opposition , a good message from a party leader !

Even though the UDF has won, it remains to be seen if they can go ahead in a smooth manner. You can certainly expect fireworks on their side because a few of their allies are totally unhappy.!

Another good message of this election result was 'no scope for bracket parties in the kerala soil', almost more than four bracket parties have been totally wiped out.

The BJP's (opposition party in the central) attempts to open account in the beautiful land 

'God's own Country' the state of Kerala, however, came to a naught and the party drew a blank !

so, no doubt it was a strong message given by the people of Kerala to all political parties, specially Indian National Congress to feel shame in their wrong doings and third class political plays.

I repeat, that all power is a trust, that we are accountable for its exercise, and that, from the people, and for the people, all springs, and all must exist !

remember ! Malayali is big enough to give you all you want is big enough to take it all away !Every man has a right to be poor".. read with Kerala and Bengal Assembly Result

Beware of Capitalists and their merchants !

Recently the European Union and America attacked Maumer Ul Qadhafi regime in Libya. Col. Qadhafi is an Arab Nationalist like Saddam Hussein. He is the greatest supporter of Arab Union but it would not suite the capitalist interests. The greatest capitalist of the world USA is fearing this Nationalism or Socialism in other parts of the world. The capitalist system of production favors investment in the world most advanced and economically sound country like America as it would give greater return than it would give in any other part of the world. So, a capitalist will not be happy if there is something like nationalism or socialism. The Libyan public is made rebellion by the mastermind technique that capitalists have been using since long to overcome Communism......a snake in the grass for a capitalist society. So, that's why America attacked Libya.

Pakistan is a marionette (puppet) in the hands of America, it will beat the same drum as America does. Pakistan is not in itself so much strong but its America who made her Strong. Pakistan's character as an American Ally is that it will enhance terrorism and will continue to do so until the American ends are served in a better way. In consideration America will make her free from its foreign debt etc.

The greatest illusion in the eyes of the general Public is that they think the Mullahs are doing Jihad.....fighting against America. Its not reality but an Illusion. These Mullahs....Jamate- Islami & Jameat Ulama Islam JUI....are dogs fighting for the sake of Jew-Arab Capitalism although they seem like to be fighting for the sake of Islam. Nevertheless they will fight for Islam,although they are wearing an Islamic cloak. They are serving the greatest interests of Arab-American Capitalists. There is no Valid Jihad except Palestine and these jihadi organizations have been hired by America and Saudia to fight Nationalism/Communism/Socialism. The reason behind this has already been discussed above.

Looking into the above situation, its crystal clear that American-Arabian capitalism is the driving force behind terrorism. Saudia founded the so-called jihadi organization....its not a jihad.....its the Charles Darwin Concept....struggle for survival of the capitalism........named Al-Qaida headed by Osama Bin Ladin....a Saudi capitalist to fight Nationalism and Socialism. With the help of Pakistani Madrassas and so-called islamists together with Saudi backed Al-Qaida is playing havoc with the innocent people lives.

But do you think why is this all around? Whats the reason behind this? The answer you know better! Its the fight between the Workers and Bourgeois. The bourgeois class is terrorizing the working class through its callous policies of suicide attacks and mass murder etc. The beneficiaries of this terrorism is 1) USA and allied nations 2) Saudia and Arab Billionaires.

This is truly an interesting question as we have been bomboozled by the mastermind that Pakistan is the first muslim country based truly on Islam. The Slogan” Pakistan Ka Mutlab Kia La Illaha Illala” was just to make people convinced on making a new Republic which will never care for Islam in any way. If asked me then my answer would be somewhat like this “ Pakistan is created to serve the American ends.....Pakistan never care for Islam in any way....Pakistan does not mean that there is no God but Allah but Pakistan means that there is no God but America instead! That's how Pakistan came into being. I know that at the time of the inception of Pakistan in 1947, Great Britain was playing the role,not America but I also know that UK and USA are the same things, cloaks just different.

Another interesting question! Well, Qaid-e Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah was impressed by the western capitalism. He dressed like them and fully adopted their culture. His suits used to be sewed in London. He was more likely to speak in English easily totally unaware of his mother tongue. Mr. Ghandi and Bacha Khan, on the other hand were not impressed by the callous western capitalism,rather they were nationalist/socialist, an opposite concept to a capitalist society. They were more likely to have a close connections with their mother tongue and culture. The case of Allama Iqbal is the same. He presented two nation theory that he himself did not vision to understand correctly. If he says that Muslims are one nation then why did not he suggest all muslim countries to unite. It was just a fraud done to us by our leaders who created Pakistan. Pakistan represents a small number of muslims of the whole world, even there are more muslims in India.

Dear All, use your commonsense,if they were to pursue two nation theory, they would not have left any muslim in India, but see there are more muslims in India than Pakistan. Pakistan was created to serve the western interests in this region. They were needing this locality especially the bordering areas with Afghanistan named the Durand Line which was signed under pressure with British Government. Pakistan was instructed to make tribal areas as Agencies and there is a lot to be mentioned which I think will go beyond the scope of this document. This area was spared for terrorism which we now see as the terrorizing center. This area allegedly contains Osama and Al-Qaida etc. These all are the American fabrications.

America have vested interests in our tribal areas since long,that's why the British Government signed the Durand Line Pact with Afghan Government. America fabricated so many lies that she is in search of terrorists like Osama etc but I don't know why people are so blind that they don't see America herself is recruiting these terrorists with the help of Pakistan ISI and funding their suicide attacks and other terrorist activities. Osama Bin Laden, Mullah Omar and Taliban are American allies, spies employed by USA. If Saddam can be found by Americans in holes, Why not Osama or Mullah Omar? Saddam had more power and more resources,places to hide than Osama and Mullah Omar, how couldn't they be found? Just ponder for a while! In a vast span of ten years they failed finding them in spite of all the advanced tracking devices and technology. It doesn't make a sense, it only make a sense that Osama and Mullah Omar are working for American-Saudian interests and they will not be captured. If Hitler and Masolini can be found and killed after seizing power of their territory, if Saddam can be hanged after controlling the reigns of Iraq and if Dr. Najeebullah Ahmadzai Shaheed can be found,killed and hanged after overthrowing his government, then why not Mullah Omar? Why not Osama Bin Laden, why not Gul Badin Hekmatyar and other Islamists? Just ponder for a while! The decision is yours based on your understanding.

America has a dual policy to overcome the stumblin blocks in her way. On one hand America was providing heavy ammunition support and financial help to Gul- Badin Hekmatyar while on other side she awarded Ahmad Shah Masoud a Noble Prize. America never wanted Ahmad Shah Masoud to succeed instead of Gul Badin Hekmatyar. Ahmad Shah Masoud was not a terrorist so he did not get any material support from America though America used to praise him often. There is again a vested interest of America that would not have been possible if Ahmad Shah Masoud would have succeeded in gaining the power of his territory.

America fears Communism as its economy will be collapsed and restructured if Communism gained power. Communism is a major threat to both Arab Billionaires and USA. So, why not will they finance terrorism to keep the people suppressed as it would rise from the place where people are poor and poor can only wage war against the rich.

Now come to the state of Pakistan. Pakistan is a tutelage country of USA....its constitution and Parliament with few exceptions is back-boned by White House. Pakistan is famous due its geographical location and has been an attraction site for USA politics. The nuclear Bomb that Pakistan have has also been granted by USA to make her powerful so that its neighboring countries may not engulf her territories. Huge financial and military support is injected into it every year by USA to keep her safe and calm. Pakistan can not do anything in her own discretion as 100% directions are dictated from Washington. So, there is something wrong in the bottom.

It was only due to these establishments that USA was capable of retreating Russian armies that led to the subsequent dismemberment of USSR.

 What will happen next is a political turmoil and war.....a continuous struggle for survival between the rich and the poor .

How dare you ..?

Proletarians (Workers) of all countries, Please Unite” Slogan of Carl Marx, still engraved on the stone of his grave in London.

Dear All, the present day situation and the Capitalists barbarism is simply because of the people who hold the above slogan that has divided the world in two separate blocs. The workers are continuously being exploited by the Business class and the system favors the Capitalist to cash in on their hard-work and labor. The great thinker and social scientist.....the Thinker of Millennium....has rightly argued about the flaws of Capitalist System of Production. 

Today, if you see the world in troubles, then understand that its because of the Capitalist system of production which is drawing the gap between the deprived and the facilitated broader and broader. The capitalist don't want the Proletarians(workers) to hold the means of production in their hands. So, a capitalist will invest his money where greater return on his investment is possible,he will never invest his money where poorer return on investment is seen. So, what happens? Gap between the rich and poor is broadened. 

Do you know whom I am talking about? One of the greatest such Capitalists is USA, which is continuously fighting for her Capitalist sake......noting else. The Arab Capitalists have allied with them leaving Libya, Palestine and Iraq in troubles. The Capitalist America needs people like Hosni Mubarik, Asif Ali Zardari and other presidents from third world who emptied the national coffers and have taken billion of dollars to invest in the western capitalist markets. Who is Starving? The labors, the workers, the proletarians especially in third world countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan and many more. If you are a great capitalist or if you are a great looter of the national wealth entrusted to you by the public, then you surely be an allied power to America.

Struggles for survival....the Charles Darwin's concept.....is the capitalist's Slogan. Struggle for your survival,Capitalize on others' wealth either lawfully or unlawfully and kill, starve the poor with brutality. Is this not you see around?

There are some questions I ask you!

Why America attacked Iraq?

Why America attacked Afghanistan?

Does America fight terrorism or create terrorism?

Why America attacked Libya?

What is the character of Pakistan as an ally to USA?

Who are Mullahs, Jihadi Organizations? Do they fight for the sake of Islam or for the sake of American-Arabian Capitalism?

Who terrorize the world actually and with whom help?

Why this all around? Who are the beneficiaries?

How Pakistan came into being?

Who was Mr. Jinnah and what about Poet Allama Iqbal?

Who are Osama and Mullah Omar and Taliban?

How America played the dual game Ahmad Shah Masoud VS Gul Badin Hekmatyar?

What fears America?

What about the state of Pakistan?

How did Saudia, USA and Pakistan with the help of Madrassas and Mullahs defeat the USSR?

What will happen next?

Saddam Hussein was a nationalist Arab and introduced Pan-Arabism. He was the member of a socialist party who espoused the socialist ideas that the wealth of the public will remain the wealth of the public and its sacredly entrusted to him as a Public Wealth and will never be let to be put on international Stock exchange, will never be invested in a place where the Public of Iraq will not reap the fruits. The capitalist system of production didn't acclaim this economical reform, so Saddam was limited in his international trade matters that lead to the subsequent murder of Saddam by the Capitalist America. The America used her mastermind to ingrain in people minds that Iraq hold chemical weapons. It was just an excuse to attack Iraq as Saddam was not like Husni Mubarik who would sweep the national wealth treasury and will invest or simply save in American Banks.

The soviet backed PDPA....Peoples Democratic Party of Afghanistan was a communist party in rule in Afghanistan by then when America started devilish activities of funding Mujahiddin to over throw Dr. Najeebullah Ahmadzai. Remember, America didn't attack Taliban,but the Soviets in indirect way. The communist economy is totally opposite to capitalist economy, so there was no milk for America.....the greatest capitalist of the world. America feared this wave of socialism encroaching nation after nation, so the Arabs and Americans capitalist started to infiltrate its billion dollar funding through its puppet Pakistan and especially the Mullah....Qazi Hussein Ahmed and later on Maulana Fazlurrahman both being American dogs. PDPA workers and members...the civilians were bombarded bitterly to weed out the roots of socialist parties from Afghanistan. An estimated 65000 PDPA members were killed in one month in Kabul by firing at least 3000 missiles a day. The huge military support came from America and financed by Saudia and exercised by Pakistan ISI in close cooperation with CIA, while Taliban playing the battle game. The democracy of Dr. Najeeb was overthrown and he was subsequently murdered brutally and hanged at Aryana Square.

It did not stop here, but America keep on assisting the terrorists herself to create civil war in Afghanistan to weaken the economy, infrastructure that resulted in enormous killing of innocent people. The question here is that “Does America fight terrorism or create terrorism?” The answer is definitely the later one “ Create Terrorism”. The general public has been schooled by the mastermind to think and believe that America is fighting terrorism. Nevertheless America will fight terrorism, rather it will create it like she is doing now. If America were fighting terrorism, then she would not have helped Gul Badin and other so called islamic militants to overthrow the soviets. America is openly supporting terrorism in Afghanistan and in other parts of the world. If it was otherwise, then America must have supported the DRA....Democratic Republic of Afghanistan and would have killed the Mujahidin. But you see America did the opposite one....supported the so-called islamists/terrorists against DRA. How could America justify herself in not supporting terrorist activities. friends Just use your commonsense .